<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 361 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155405</link>
    <description>The amended composition levy under section 4A of the Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act remained enforceable despite the 1985 omission of a fresh explanation on gross collection capacity, because the provision had to be read as part of the full statutory scheme. The court rejected a rigid literal reading that would create a vacuum and defeat the amendment&#039;s purpose, and applied schematic interpretation with the casus omissus principle to supply the missing reference. On that approach, the relevant date for theatres opting under the amended scheme was read as 15 February 1986, and recovery of the difference of tax was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 11:47:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 361 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155405</link>
      <description>The amended composition levy under section 4A of the Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act remained enforceable despite the 1985 omission of a fresh explanation on gross collection capacity, because the provision had to be read as part of the full statutory scheme. The court rejected a rigid literal reading that would create a vacuum and defeat the amendment&#039;s purpose, and applied schematic interpretation with the casus omissus principle to supply the missing reference. On that approach, the relevant date for theatres opting under the amended scheme was read as 15 February 1986, and recovery of the difference of tax was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>