<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 858 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155400</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of credit for shapes and sections used to fabricate moulds, ruling that they do not qualify as capital goods under the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. The demand for duty was upheld, but the penalty imposed under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules was significantly reduced due to the circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2017 07:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 858 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155400</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of credit for shapes and sections used to fabricate moulds, ruling that they do not qualify as capital goods under the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. The demand for duty was upheld, but the penalty imposed under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules was significantly reduced due to the circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>