<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 353 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155397</link>
    <description>In a best judgment assessment, detected suppression does not have to be extrapolated to the entire assessment year in every case. The estimate must maintain a reasonable nexus with the material actually discovered, and the assessing authority or appellate fact-finder may confine the addition to the period supported by evidence on record. There is no legal compulsion to spread a single detected suppression across the whole year if the facts justify a narrower estimation. On those facts, the Tribunal was justified in limiting the enhancement to the supported period, and the principle operated in favour of the dealer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 11:21:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 353 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155397</link>
      <description>In a best judgment assessment, detected suppression does not have to be extrapolated to the entire assessment year in every case. The estimate must maintain a reasonable nexus with the material actually discovered, and the assessing authority or appellate fact-finder may confine the addition to the period supported by evidence on record. There is no legal compulsion to spread a single detected suppression across the whole year if the facts justify a narrower estimation. On those facts, the Tribunal was justified in limiting the enhancement to the supported period, and the principle operated in favour of the dealer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>