<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 363 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155365</link>
    <description>Interest on delayed payment of admitted tax under the U.P. Sales Tax Act arises automatically on the statutory contingency and does not require a separate assessment or demand notice. The deeming provision operates only for recovery and does not turn the arithmetical computation of interest into a formal adjudicatory order. Because &quot;order&quot; in section 9 refers to a decision involving adjudication by the assessing authority, a mere calculation of mandatory interest is not appealable. The material therefore concludes that no appeal lies against the simple levy calculation, and the appellate orders were without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 17:38:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 363 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155365</link>
      <description>Interest on delayed payment of admitted tax under the U.P. Sales Tax Act arises automatically on the statutory contingency and does not require a separate assessment or demand notice. The deeming provision operates only for recovery and does not turn the arithmetical computation of interest into a formal adjudicatory order. Because &quot;order&quot; in section 9 refers to a decision involving adjudication by the assessing authority, a mere calculation of mandatory interest is not appealable. The material therefore concludes that no appeal lies against the simple levy calculation, and the appellate orders were without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>