<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 694 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155355</link>
    <description>Conditional small-scale exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. is unavailable where goods are cleared under another person&#039;s registered brand name, and minor changes in the logo do not avoid the bar. The notification requires strict compliance, so use of a third party&#039;s trade mark defeats the exemption. Non-disclosure of that material fact in exemption declarations amounts to suppression, particularly where the trademark records were publicly available and no bona fide verification was shown. On that basis, the extended limitation period can be invoked. Where exemption is denied and duty was not quantified below, the matter may be remanded for fresh determination of duty, interest, and consequential penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 17:11:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 694 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155355</link>
      <description>Conditional small-scale exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. is unavailable where goods are cleared under another person&#039;s registered brand name, and minor changes in the logo do not avoid the bar. The notification requires strict compliance, so use of a third party&#039;s trade mark defeats the exemption. Non-disclosure of that material fact in exemption declarations amounts to suppression, particularly where the trademark records were publicly available and no bona fide verification was shown. On that basis, the extended limitation period can be invoked. Where exemption is denied and duty was not quantified below, the matter may be remanded for fresh determination of duty, interest, and consequential penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>