<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 739 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155353</link>
    <description>Modvat or Cenvat credit on capital goods was barred where depreciation on the duty element had already been claimed and allowed under the Income-tax Act; the fact that the assessee&#039;s final tax liability was computed under minimum alternate tax did not avoid the statutory prohibition. A long delay in filing the Modvat declaration, together with conscious non-disclosure, supported denial of credit and justified invocation of the extended period. The substantive demand and interest were sustained, while personal penalty on the company officer was set aside and only limited statutory relief was granted on penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 739 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155353</link>
      <description>Modvat or Cenvat credit on capital goods was barred where depreciation on the duty element had already been claimed and allowed under the Income-tax Act; the fact that the assessee&#039;s final tax liability was computed under minimum alternate tax did not avoid the statutory prohibition. A long delay in filing the Modvat declaration, together with conscious non-disclosure, supported denial of credit and justified invocation of the extended period. The substantive demand and interest were sustained, while personal penalty on the company officer was set aside and only limited statutory relief was granted on penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>