<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (6) TMI 385 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155351</link>
    <description>Cast iron castings were treated as falling within item No. 2(i) of the Third Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, because the Government&#039;s clarification under section 42(2) covered them within the expression &quot;cast iron including ingot.&quot; That clarification was binding on the Commissioner, who could not adopt a contrary classification in assessment. The assessment orders were therefore quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 17:05:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (6) TMI 385 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155351</link>
      <description>Cast iron castings were treated as falling within item No. 2(i) of the Third Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, because the Government&#039;s clarification under section 42(2) covered them within the expression &quot;cast iron including ingot.&quot; That clarification was binding on the Commissioner, who could not adopt a contrary classification in assessment. The assessment orders were therefore quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>