<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 854 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155330</link>
    <description>Prima facie evidence of artificial splitting of a business to retain SSI exemption can justify denial of complete pre-deposit. The record showed common management, shared power, staff and labour, use of the same brand name, routed sales, and a director&#039;s statement suggesting the second unit was created to keep the first unit within the exemption limit and lacked independent financial viability. On that basis, the Tribunal found a strong prima facie case for the Department, declined total waiver of pre-deposit, and directed partial pre-deposit with stay of the balance demand, interest and penalty pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:26:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 854 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155330</link>
      <description>Prima facie evidence of artificial splitting of a business to retain SSI exemption can justify denial of complete pre-deposit. The record showed common management, shared power, staff and labour, use of the same brand name, routed sales, and a director&#039;s statement suggesting the second unit was created to keep the first unit within the exemption limit and lacked independent financial viability. On that basis, the Tribunal found a strong prima facie case for the Department, declined total waiver of pre-deposit, and directed partial pre-deposit with stay of the balance demand, interest and penalty pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>