<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 436 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155329</link>
    <description>Charges collected by a seller for work that is integral and inseparable from the sale transaction form part of taxable turnover where the statutory definition of turnover is wide enough to include all sums charged in connection with the sale. The painting of auto-rickshaws was undertaken by the assessee itself and was required before the vehicles could be put on the road; although the charges were shown separately in the bills, they were treated as part of the same commercial transaction as the sale. The painting charges were therefore includible in turnover and not exempt, and the Tribunal&#039;s exemption to that extent was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:24:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 436 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155329</link>
      <description>Charges collected by a seller for work that is integral and inseparable from the sale transaction form part of taxable turnover where the statutory definition of turnover is wide enough to include all sums charged in connection with the sale. The painting of auto-rickshaws was undertaken by the assessee itself and was required before the vehicles could be put on the road; although the charges were shown separately in the bills, they were treated as part of the same commercial transaction as the sale. The painting charges were therefore includible in turnover and not exempt, and the Tribunal&#039;s exemption to that extent was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>