<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 609 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155314</link>
    <description>A child born from a void second marriage is treated as legitimate under Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, but that protection is limited and does not validate the marriage or enlarge the mother&#039;s legal status. The statutory restriction in Section 16(3) also confines the child&#039;s rights to property of the parents and does not extend to other benefits. Compassionate appointment is a statutory family benefit, not a property right, so entitlement depends on the governing service rules. A person outside the statutory definition of family cannot claim that benefit, and a private settlement cannot create a right that the rules do not confer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:46:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 609 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155314</link>
      <description>A child born from a void second marriage is treated as legitimate under Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, but that protection is limited and does not validate the marriage or enlarge the mother&#039;s legal status. The statutory restriction in Section 16(3) also confines the child&#039;s rights to property of the parents and does not extend to other benefits. Compassionate appointment is a statutory family benefit, not a property right, so entitlement depends on the governing service rules. A person outside the statutory definition of family cannot claim that benefit, and a private settlement cannot create a right that the rules do not confer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>