https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155303 The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty, interest, and penalty for the period from March 1994 to January 1999, finding that the appellant deliberately excluded the amortized cost of moulds from the assessable value, indicating an intent to evade payment of appropriate duty. The Tribunal ruled that the demand for the period from 1997-98 to 31-1-99 was not time-barred, while the demand for the prior period was time-barred. The matter was remanded for re-quantification of interest and penalty. en-us Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 May 2017 11:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155303 The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty, interest, and penalty for the period from March 1994 to January 1999, finding that the appellant deliberately excluded the amortized cost of moulds from the assessable value, indicating an intent to evade payment of appropriate duty. The Tribunal ruled that the demand for the period from 1997-98 to 31-1-99 was not time-barred, while the demand for the prior period was time-barred. The matter was remanded for re-quantification of interest and penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155303