https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155301 Compassionate appointment required strict proof of the claimed adoption, and the respondent failed to establish a valid adoptive relationship because no registered adoption deed was produced and the surrounding records did not support the plea. The Court held that, absent proof of adoption, he had no entitlement to appointment on that basis. Where the appointment had been procured by suppression of material facts, the Department was entitled to cancel it; fraud vitiates the act, and prior notice or audi alteram partem did not save the appointment. The writ court's interference was therefore unsustainable, and the cancellation was restored. en-us Tue, 05 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jan 2018 10:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155301 Compassionate appointment required strict proof of the claimed adoption, and the respondent failed to establish a valid adoptive relationship because no registered adoption deed was produced and the surrounding records did not support the plea. The Court held that, absent proof of adoption, he had no entitlement to appointment on that basis. Where the appointment had been procured by suppression of material facts, the Department was entitled to cancel it; fraud vitiates the act, and prior notice or audi alteram partem did not save the appointment. The writ court's interference was therefore unsustainable, and the cancellation was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155301