<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 813 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155298</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the department, setting aside the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision to grant a cash refund to the respondent. The respondent failed to prove that they had not passed on the duty burden to their buyer, and the reliance on Balance Sheets from a period long after the imports was deemed insufficient evidence. The Tribunal emphasized that uniformity of prices before and after import does not automatically negate the passing on of duty burden, as required under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 11:43:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 813 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155298</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the department, setting aside the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision to grant a cash refund to the respondent. The respondent failed to prove that they had not passed on the duty burden to their buyer, and the reliance on Balance Sheets from a period long after the imports was deemed insufficient evidence. The Tribunal emphasized that uniformity of prices before and after import does not automatically negate the passing on of duty burden, as required under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>