<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 812 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155297</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed against a demand of duty, interest, and penalty under the Central Excise Act due to damaged goods from floods. Despite the remission application, a show-cause notice was issued. The lower authorities upheld the duty demand, which the appellant did not challenge. The Tribunal sustained the duty demand but removed interest and penalty, as the notice did not meet requirements for penalty under Section 11AC and lacked grounds for interest recovery under Section 11AB.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 11:39:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 812 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155297</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed against a demand of duty, interest, and penalty under the Central Excise Act due to damaged goods from floods. Despite the remission application, a show-cause notice was issued. The lower authorities upheld the duty demand, which the appellant did not challenge. The Tribunal sustained the duty demand but removed interest and penalty, as the notice did not meet requirements for penalty under Section 11AC and lacked grounds for interest recovery under Section 11AB.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>