<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 809 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155293</link>
    <description>Refund claims are not barred by unjust enrichment where audited balance sheet and profit and loss records, ledger entries showing the amount as receivable, a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate, and an affidavit establish that the duty incidence on captive-consumed goods was not passed on to buyers. In the absence of contrary evidence from the Revenue, such documentary proof is sufficient to rebut the presumption that the duty burden was indirectly included in the value of the goods, and the refund remains admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 809 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155293</link>
      <description>Refund claims are not barred by unjust enrichment where audited balance sheet and profit and loss records, ledger entries showing the amount as receivable, a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate, and an affidavit establish that the duty incidence on captive-consumed goods was not passed on to buyers. In the absence of contrary evidence from the Revenue, such documentary proof is sufficient to rebut the presumption that the duty burden was indirectly included in the value of the goods, and the refund remains admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>