https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155289 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the appellant Bank, setting aside the High Court's orders. The Court upheld the Bank's decision, stating that the financial condition of the respondent's family did not meet the criteria for compassionate appointment. The Court emphasized that compassionate appointments are for families in penury, which was not the case here. The application of the 2005 scheme to a 2000 application was deemed inappropriate. The appeal was allowed without costs. en-us Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155289 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the appellant Bank, setting aside the High Court's orders. The Court upheld the Bank's decision, stating that the financial condition of the respondent's family did not meet the criteria for compassionate appointment. The Court emphasized that compassionate appointments are for families in penury, which was not the case here. The application of the 2005 scheme to a 2000 application was deemed inappropriate. The appeal was allowed without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155289