<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 493 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155264</link>
    <description>An assessee cannot raise before the sales tax appellate tribunal a new objection to the taxability of turnover that was not disputed before the first appellate authority, because the tribunal&#039;s scope is confined to matters already in issue. A separate plea that the assessing authority failed to apply the statutory formula for determining taxable turnover must, however, be examined by the tribunal as the final fact-finding forum. The commentary therefore distinguishes between an impermissible fresh ground on liability and a required review of the computation method under section 8-A(1)(a), with the latter needing reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 17:35:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 493 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155264</link>
      <description>An assessee cannot raise before the sales tax appellate tribunal a new objection to the taxability of turnover that was not disputed before the first appellate authority, because the tribunal&#039;s scope is confined to matters already in issue. A separate plea that the assessing authority failed to apply the statutory formula for determining taxable turnover must, however, be examined by the tribunal as the final fact-finding forum. The commentary therefore distinguishes between an impermissible fresh ground on liability and a required review of the computation method under section 8-A(1)(a), with the latter needing reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>