<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 856 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155243</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for excess duty refund due to short receipt by the purchaser, finding the claim valid under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The slight shortage in goods received did not invalidate the refund claim, as the appellant had not passed on the excess duty to the customer and the shortage reported was genuine. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal and disposed of both cases accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 15:46:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 856 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155243</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for excess duty refund due to short receipt by the purchaser, finding the claim valid under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The slight shortage in goods received did not invalidate the refund claim, as the appellant had not passed on the excess duty to the customer and the shortage reported was genuine. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal and disposed of both cases accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>