<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 380 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155237</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 18(1) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959 cannot be initiated on the same materials already examined in the original assessment, because a mere second thought or change of opinion does not amount to &quot;information&quot; for reassessment. Where the deduction claim was accepted after scrutiny of the record and accounts, a later notice based on the same facts is impermissible. The reassessment initiation was therefore invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 15:39:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 380 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155237</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 18(1) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959 cannot be initiated on the same materials already examined in the original assessment, because a mere second thought or change of opinion does not amount to &quot;information&quot; for reassessment. Where the deduction claim was accepted after scrutiny of the record and accounts, a later notice based on the same facts is impermissible. The reassessment initiation was therefore invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>