<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (1) TMI 331 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155216</link>
    <description>Writ petitions challenging assessment proceedings under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act and the refusal to implement Government waiver orders were not entertained because the statutory appeals were already pending before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Court treated the waiver-related administrative directions as matters to be worked out in assessment and held that, even if strict compliance had not been followed, the petitioners had shown no prejudice warranting writ interference. A request for stay was also declined because an effective appellate remedy remained available, including any stay application before the appellate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 13:58:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (1) TMI 331 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155216</link>
      <description>Writ petitions challenging assessment proceedings under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act and the refusal to implement Government waiver orders were not entertained because the statutory appeals were already pending before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Court treated the waiver-related administrative directions as matters to be worked out in assessment and held that, even if strict compliance had not been followed, the petitioners had shown no prejudice warranting writ interference. A request for stay was also declined because an effective appellate remedy remained available, including any stay application before the appellate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>