<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 401 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155210</link>
    <description>Retention of seized exercise books beyond the statutory period without the Commissioner&#039;s prior approval was unauthorized, and the best judgment assessment founded on those books could not stand. Section 6(2) also required the Assessing Authority to determine when tax liability arose after the turnover first exceeded the taxable quantum; no such date was fixed, so the assessment failed to apply the provision correctly. The Tribunal was required to entertain this jurisdictional question of law under its appellate powers even though it had not been raised earlier. The assessment and appellate orders were therefore quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 12:56:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 401 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155210</link>
      <description>Retention of seized exercise books beyond the statutory period without the Commissioner&#039;s prior approval was unauthorized, and the best judgment assessment founded on those books could not stand. Section 6(2) also required the Assessing Authority to determine when tax liability arose after the turnover first exceeded the taxable quantum; no such date was fixed, so the assessment failed to apply the provision correctly. The Tribunal was required to entertain this jurisdictional question of law under its appellate powers even though it had not been raised earlier. The assessment and appellate orders were therefore quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>