<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (6) TMI 382 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155205</link>
    <description>Processed prawns purchased and exported after cleaning, peeling and sorting were treated as the same commodity for exemption under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The Supreme Court ruling that processing did not change the identity of the goods directly governed the issue, so the Tribunal&#039;s view in favour of the assessee was upheld and the exemption benefit was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 12:40:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (6) TMI 382 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155205</link>
      <description>Processed prawns purchased and exported after cleaning, peeling and sorting were treated as the same commodity for exemption under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The Supreme Court ruling that processing did not change the identity of the goods directly governed the issue, so the Tribunal&#039;s view in favour of the assessee was upheld and the exemption benefit was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>