<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 800 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155197</link>
    <description>Classification of export goods under an incorrect drawback schedule heading, by itself, was not treated as a misdeclaration justifying confiscation, redemption fine, or penalty. The error was confined to claiming a drawback heading different from the one later accepted by customs, and scrutiny of the shipping documents and verification of the correct heading was primarily the responsibility of the proper officer. The allegation of misdeclaration therefore failed, and confiscation, fine, and penalty did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 12:12:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 800 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155197</link>
      <description>Classification of export goods under an incorrect drawback schedule heading, by itself, was not treated as a misdeclaration justifying confiscation, redemption fine, or penalty. The error was confined to claiming a drawback heading different from the one later accepted by customs, and scrutiny of the shipping documents and verification of the correct heading was primarily the responsibility of the proper officer. The allegation of misdeclaration therefore failed, and confiscation, fine, and penalty did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>