<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 460 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155188</link>
    <description>A summary rejection of a first appeal under rule 49 is treated as a dismissal of an appeal for purposes of the statutory right of second appeal under section 23(2) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act. On that basis, the second appeal remains maintainable before the Tribunal, which then has full jurisdiction to examine both facts and law under section 23. Where the Tribunal has not considered the appeals on merits, the matter must be reconsidered in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 11:38:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 460 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155188</link>
      <description>A summary rejection of a first appeal under rule 49 is treated as a dismissal of an appeal for purposes of the statutory right of second appeal under section 23(2) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act. On that basis, the second appeal remains maintainable before the Tribunal, which then has full jurisdiction to examine both facts and law under section 23. Where the Tribunal has not considered the appeals on merits, the matter must be reconsidered in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>