<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (9) TMI 400 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155165</link>
    <description>Where a dealer&#039;s registration application under the Central Sales Tax Act specifically included goods needed for resale, manufacture and packing, but the registering authority omitted those goods by inadvertence, the certificate had to be amended retrospectively from the date of the original registration. The authority was required to make an objective determination of the goods covered by the business and could not let its own mistake prejudice the dealer&#039;s statutory position. On that basis, the consequential penalty and security orders were unsustainable, and declaration forms had to be issued in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 18:11:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (9) TMI 400 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155165</link>
      <description>Where a dealer&#039;s registration application under the Central Sales Tax Act specifically included goods needed for resale, manufacture and packing, but the registering authority omitted those goods by inadvertence, the certificate had to be amended retrospectively from the date of the original registration. The authority was required to make an objective determination of the goods covered by the business and could not let its own mistake prejudice the dealer&#039;s statutory position. On that basis, the consequential penalty and security orders were unsustainable, and declaration forms had to be issued in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>