<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 795 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155161</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found two appellant companies liable for clandestine removal of processed fabric without duty payment. One company was ordered to pay duty of Rs. 86,01,121 with interest and penalty, while the other company and its directors faced penalties. The Tribunal reduced the duty liability to Rs. 64 lakhs due to insufficient corroboration of evidence and deemed the denial of cross-examination a breach of natural justice. They directed the deposit of Rs. 22 lakhs with interest, pending appeal disposal, emphasizing the importance of corroborative evidence and procedural fairness in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 17:52:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 795 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155161</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found two appellant companies liable for clandestine removal of processed fabric without duty payment. One company was ordered to pay duty of Rs. 86,01,121 with interest and penalty, while the other company and its directors faced penalties. The Tribunal reduced the duty liability to Rs. 64 lakhs due to insufficient corroboration of evidence and deemed the denial of cross-examination a breach of natural justice. They directed the deposit of Rs. 22 lakhs with interest, pending appeal disposal, emphasizing the importance of corroborative evidence and procedural fairness in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>