<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 806 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155157</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the company&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing the memorandum of Cross Objections, citing the company&#039;s lack of prompt action upon receiving the notice of appeal. Despite arguments for liberal treatment based on previous decisions and justice-oriented considerations, the Tribunal found the company&#039;s failure to establish sufficient cause for the delay. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a reliable system to handle appeals promptly and distinguished the case from previous instances where delays were condoned under different circumstances. Consequently, the Cross Objection filed by the company was disposed of by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 17:37:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 806 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155157</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the company&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing the memorandum of Cross Objections, citing the company&#039;s lack of prompt action upon receiving the notice of appeal. Despite arguments for liberal treatment based on previous decisions and justice-oriented considerations, the Tribunal found the company&#039;s failure to establish sufficient cause for the delay. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a reliable system to handle appeals promptly and distinguished the case from previous instances where delays were condoned under different circumstances. Consequently, the Cross Objection filed by the company was disposed of by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>