<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 372 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155153</link>
    <description>Cancellation of a dealer&#039;s registration certificate under the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, 1947 could not be given retrospective effect. Rule 16(1) empowered the Sales Tax Officer to cancel registration from a date specified in the order, but that power was limited to the date of the order or a future date and did not permit backdating. The Orissa High Court treated retrospective cancellation as beyond the rule-making authority and therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 17:29:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 372 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155153</link>
      <description>Cancellation of a dealer&#039;s registration certificate under the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, 1947 could not be given retrospective effect. Rule 16(1) empowered the Sales Tax Officer to cancel registration from a date specified in the order, but that power was limited to the date of the order or a future date and did not permit backdating. The Orissa High Court treated retrospective cancellation as beyond the rule-making authority and therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>