<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (8) TMI 435 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155130</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to provisional assessment, demand notice and account attachment under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 was treated as barred where effective statutory remedies were available. The scheme distinguished action for evasion or avoidance of tax under section 7-B, with immediate payment and recovery consequences under section 11-A, from regular assessment and recovery under sections 10 and 11. Because the assessee could seek setting aside of the ex parte assessment under section 10-C and pursue an appeal under section 13, Article 226 relief was not to be used to bypass the statutory process in revenue matters. The assessment action was therefore not shown to be wholly without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 16:08:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (8) TMI 435 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155130</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to provisional assessment, demand notice and account attachment under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 was treated as barred where effective statutory remedies were available. The scheme distinguished action for evasion or avoidance of tax under section 7-B, with immediate payment and recovery consequences under section 11-A, from regular assessment and recovery under sections 10 and 11. Because the assessee could seek setting aside of the ex parte assessment under section 10-C and pursue an appeal under section 13, Article 226 relief was not to be used to bypass the statutory process in revenue matters. The assessment action was therefore not shown to be wholly without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>