<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 690 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155129</link>
    <description>The Chennai appellate tribunal upheld a demand of Rs. 52,224 with interest against the assessees for reversing credit on transformer oil cleared separately. The penalty under Section 11AC was set aside due to the absence of suppression or misstatement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 16:24:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 690 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155129</link>
      <description>The Chennai appellate tribunal upheld a demand of Rs. 52,224 with interest against the assessees for reversing credit on transformer oil cleared separately. The penalty under Section 11AC was set aside due to the absence of suppression or misstatement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>