<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 222 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155119</link>
    <description>Penalty for failure to deposit admitted sales tax within time depended on whether the assessee had reasonable cause for the default under section 15-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s financial difficulty on facts, noting a genuine business slump, reduced sales, declining bank credit, creditor pressure, and absence of mala fide intention. The Court treated financial difficulty as a relevant circumstance in some cases and distinguished situations involving diversion of collected tax or self-induced default. As no error of law was shown in the Tribunal&#039;s finding of lack of mala fides and tight financial position, the penalty was not interfered with.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 15:27:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 222 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155119</link>
      <description>Penalty for failure to deposit admitted sales tax within time depended on whether the assessee had reasonable cause for the default under section 15-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s financial difficulty on facts, noting a genuine business slump, reduced sales, declining bank credit, creditor pressure, and absence of mala fide intention. The Court treated financial difficulty as a relevant circumstance in some cases and distinguished situations involving diversion of collected tax or self-induced default. As no error of law was shown in the Tribunal&#039;s finding of lack of mala fides and tight financial position, the penalty was not interfered with.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>