<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 832 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155107</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery to the appellant in a customs duty dispute. The appellant, who imported capital goods under a project import registration, faced duty demands due to non-production of required documents under Regulation No. 7. Despite earlier orders, the original authority upheld the duty demand. The Tribunal found the appellant eligible under Regulation No. 4, emphasizing compliance with substantive conditions. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, acknowledging substantial compliance with procedural requirements under Regulation No. 7, ultimately providing relief in the form of waiver and stay of recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 14:59:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 832 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155107</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery to the appellant in a customs duty dispute. The appellant, who imported capital goods under a project import registration, faced duty demands due to non-production of required documents under Regulation No. 7. Despite earlier orders, the original authority upheld the duty demand. The Tribunal found the appellant eligible under Regulation No. 4, emphasizing compliance with substantive conditions. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, acknowledging substantial compliance with procedural requirements under Regulation No. 7, ultimately providing relief in the form of waiver and stay of recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>