<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 329 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155102</link>
    <description>Coal purchases were treated as taking place outside Bombay because the goods were despatched from Bihar on f.o.r. terms, inspected by the buyer&#039;s agent at the Bihar railhead, and actually delivered there. Under Article 286(1)(a) and the then applicable constitutional explanation, the place of actual delivery as a direct result of the sale governed the situs of the purchase for tax purposes. Since delivery occurred in Bihar, the deeming provision did not treat the transaction as occurring in Bombay, and the passing of property there did not alter that result. The purchases were therefore not taxable as purchases within Bombay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 14:48:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 329 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155102</link>
      <description>Coal purchases were treated as taking place outside Bombay because the goods were despatched from Bihar on f.o.r. terms, inspected by the buyer&#039;s agent at the Bihar railhead, and actually delivered there. Under Article 286(1)(a) and the then applicable constitutional explanation, the place of actual delivery as a direct result of the sale governed the situs of the purchase for tax purposes. Since delivery occurred in Bihar, the deeming provision did not treat the transaction as occurring in Bombay, and the passing of property there did not alter that result. The purchases were therefore not taxable as purchases within Bombay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>