<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 787 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155101</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal seeking to enhance a penalty from Rs. 3,000 to Rs. 10,000, as the original penalty order had been set aside prior to the appeal, rendering the review order ineffective. The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable and rejected it, emphasizing the importance of legal actions being based on existing and enforceable orders for procedural correctness in the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 14:50:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 787 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155101</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal seeking to enhance a penalty from Rs. 3,000 to Rs. 10,000, as the original penalty order had been set aside prior to the appeal, rendering the review order ineffective. The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable and rejected it, emphasizing the importance of legal actions being based on existing and enforceable orders for procedural correctness in the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>