<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1022 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155073</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 6 lakhs as unexplained investment under section 69 and the disallowance of Rs. 48,530 as personal expenses. The assessee&#039;s appeals on both grounds were dismissed due to a lack of substantial evidence and failure to convincingly argue against the findings of the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 11:57:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1022 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155073</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 6 lakhs as unexplained investment under section 69 and the disallowance of Rs. 48,530 as personal expenses. The assessee&#039;s appeals on both grounds were dismissed due to a lack of substantial evidence and failure to convincingly argue against the findings of the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>