<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1017 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155029</link>
    <description>Section 115VD&#039;s exclusion for goods or services of a kind normally provided on land does not disqualify a seagoing ship merely because the cargo could also be moved by road or rail. The article explains that the provision targets land-based commercial activities shifted onto a ship, not ordinary port-to-port maritime carriage of bulk cargo. A literal reading consistent with the tonnage tax scheme therefore treats such coastal shipping as within the definition of a qualifying ship. The contrary view, based on the availability of land transport, is rejected in the stated analysis, while the dissent would apply the exclusion more strictly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1017 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155029</link>
      <description>Section 115VD&#039;s exclusion for goods or services of a kind normally provided on land does not disqualify a seagoing ship merely because the cargo could also be moved by road or rail. The article explains that the provision targets land-based commercial activities shifted onto a ship, not ordinary port-to-port maritime carriage of bulk cargo. A literal reading consistent with the tonnage tax scheme therefore treats such coastal shipping as within the definition of a qualifying ship. The contrary view, based on the availability of land transport, is rejected in the stated analysis, while the dissent would apply the exclusion more strictly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>