<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1223 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155013</link>
    <description>The appeal for the assessment year 2000-01 was allowed in part, primarily deleting the addition of Rs. 7.42 crores for that year. The cross appeals for the assessment year 2004-05 were also partly allowed, with directions for fresh adjudication on certain issues. The Tribunal emphasized the correct assessment year for taxing the benefit from the compromise with Syndicate Bank and addressed various procedural and substantive issues raised by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1223 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155013</link>
      <description>The appeal for the assessment year 2000-01 was allowed in part, primarily deleting the addition of Rs. 7.42 crores for that year. The cross appeals for the assessment year 2004-05 were also partly allowed, with directions for fresh adjudication on certain issues. The Tribunal emphasized the correct assessment year for taxing the benefit from the compromise with Syndicate Bank and addressed various procedural and substantive issues raised by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>