<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 368 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154988</link>
    <description>The court upheld the differential tax rates based on sales to registered and unregistered dealers under the Central Sales Tax Act. Challenges regarding the extension of the Bengal Finance Act and delegation of legislative functions were rejected. Penalties imposed under the Act were deemed valid. The writ petition was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 17:49:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 368 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154988</link>
      <description>The court upheld the differential tax rates based on sales to registered and unregistered dealers under the Central Sales Tax Act. Challenges regarding the extension of the Bengal Finance Act and delegation of legislative functions were rejected. Penalties imposed under the Act were deemed valid. The writ petition was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>