https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154968 The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the credit availed on the corrugated boxes was valid. The duty liability on pet jars was correctly discharged, and procedural lapses did not warrant denial of the substantial benefit of Cenvat credit. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:47:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154968 The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the credit availed on the corrugated boxes was valid. The duty liability on pet jars was correctly discharged, and procedural lapses did not warrant denial of the substantial benefit of Cenvat credit. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154968