<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (8) TMI 430 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154965</link>
    <description>Release of detained goods on bond did not prevent recovery proceedings where the goods had been found liable to tax-related action, and the person who obtained release could not later resist realisation of the liability by disputing ownership after the fact. The text also notes that the writ petition was not a suitable forum because the adjudication order was appealable and the dispute turned on factual questions about the chain of transactions, leasing arrangements, and responsibility for the goods. The availability of an efficacious statutory remedy weighed against interference under Article 226, leaving statutory remedies open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:43:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (8) TMI 430 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154965</link>
      <description>Release of detained goods on bond did not prevent recovery proceedings where the goods had been found liable to tax-related action, and the person who obtained release could not later resist realisation of the liability by disputing ownership after the fact. The text also notes that the writ petition was not a suitable forum because the adjudication order was appealable and the dispute turned on factual questions about the chain of transactions, leasing arrangements, and responsibility for the goods. The availability of an efficacious statutory remedy weighed against interference under Article 226, leaving statutory remedies open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>