<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 348 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154951</link>
    <description>Sewing machines and their parts were not liable to sales tax at 7 per cent and 8 per cent for assessment year 1973-74 because the specific entry covering them had been deleted by notification, so the goods could be taxed only under the entry then lawfully applicable. The Court followed its earlier view on the same commodity and statutory entries, holding that the Tribunal&#039;s higher-rate classification was not sustainable. The operative principle was that once a specific tariff entry is removed, the commodity cannot continue to be assessed under an inapplicable higher-rate classification; the question was answered in favour of the dealer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:44:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 348 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154951</link>
      <description>Sewing machines and their parts were not liable to sales tax at 7 per cent and 8 per cent for assessment year 1973-74 because the specific entry covering them had been deleted by notification, so the goods could be taxed only under the entry then lawfully applicable. The Court followed its earlier view on the same commodity and statutory entries, holding that the Tribunal&#039;s higher-rate classification was not sustainable. The operative principle was that once a specific tariff entry is removed, the commodity cannot continue to be assessed under an inapplicable higher-rate classification; the question was answered in favour of the dealer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>