<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 794 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154945</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overruled the objection raised by the SDR and allowed the application for recalling the final order and reopening the hearing on the appeal. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant that the issue to be considered was the admissibility of the refund claim without unjust enrichment, not the MODVAT credit. The appeal was scheduled for a fresh hearing on a specified date as requested by the appellant&#039;s counsel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:18:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 794 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154945</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overruled the objection raised by the SDR and allowed the application for recalling the final order and reopening the hearing on the appeal. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant that the issue to be considered was the admissibility of the refund claim without unjust enrichment, not the MODVAT credit. The appeal was scheduled for a fresh hearing on a specified date as requested by the appellant&#039;s counsel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>