https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154942 The case involved M/s Sai Metaplast facing a duty demand for availing credit on common inputs used for both dutiable and job work goods. The impugned order required them to pay duty under Rule 6(3)(b) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant argued that credit on inputs used in job work can be utilized for duty payment on other goods. The Tribunal upheld the applicability of this argument, emphasizing the admissibility of credit on inputs used in job work. The rejection of the Revenue's appeal was due to the lack of merit in demanding duty for job work to 100% EOU exempt from duty under Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. en-us Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:15:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154942 The case involved M/s Sai Metaplast facing a duty demand for availing credit on common inputs used for both dutiable and job work goods. The impugned order required them to pay duty under Rule 6(3)(b) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant argued that credit on inputs used in job work can be utilized for duty payment on other goods. The Tribunal upheld the applicability of this argument, emphasizing the admissibility of credit on inputs used in job work. The rejection of the Revenue's appeal was due to the lack of merit in demanding duty for job work to 100% EOU exempt from duty under Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154942