<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 345 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154940</link>
    <description>The proviso to the 18 July 1979 exemption notification, limiting relief to wheat purchased from the Food Corporation of India, was upheld; a subsequent policy permitting open-market purchases did not justify striking down the condition attached to the exemption. The writ petition was also held not maintainable because the petitioners had an efficacious statutory appeal against the provisional assessment orders under the U.P. Sales Tax regime. Article 226 could not be used to bypass the prescribed appellate remedy in a revenue matter, absent exceptional circumstances. The challenge to both the notification and the assessment orders therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:10:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 345 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154940</link>
      <description>The proviso to the 18 July 1979 exemption notification, limiting relief to wheat purchased from the Food Corporation of India, was upheld; a subsequent policy permitting open-market purchases did not justify striking down the condition attached to the exemption. The writ petition was also held not maintainable because the petitioners had an efficacious statutory appeal against the provisional assessment orders under the U.P. Sales Tax regime. Article 226 could not be used to bypass the prescribed appellate remedy in a revenue matter, absent exceptional circumstances. The challenge to both the notification and the assessment orders therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>