<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 780 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154936</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision in favor of the respondents, emphasizing that they had not charged extra amounts from customers and had paid the duty on the assessable value without abatement for the luxury tax, leading to the excess duty payment. The appeal filed by the Revenue was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:42:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 780 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154936</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision in favor of the respondents, emphasizing that they had not charged extra amounts from customers and had paid the duty on the assessable value without abatement for the luxury tax, leading to the excess duty payment. The appeal filed by the Revenue was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>