<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 778 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154933</link>
    <description>The court granted condonation of a 3-day delay in the Revenue&#039;s appeal filing and dismissed the stay application. The dispute centered on the classification of goods, specifically mono potassium phosphate, imported by the respondent. Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument for classification under a different heading, the court found that the goods met the criteria for classification under Heading 3105 as fertilizers. The judgment emphasized adherence to technical specifications and noted the absence of departmental testing on the imported goods. Consequently, the stay application was rejected based on this classification analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:18:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 778 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154933</link>
      <description>The court granted condonation of a 3-day delay in the Revenue&#039;s appeal filing and dismissed the stay application. The dispute centered on the classification of goods, specifically mono potassium phosphate, imported by the respondent. Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument for classification under a different heading, the court found that the goods met the criteria for classification under Heading 3105 as fertilizers. The judgment emphasized adherence to technical specifications and noted the absence of departmental testing on the imported goods. Consequently, the stay application was rejected based on this classification analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>