<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 778 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154933</link>
    <description>A marginal 3-day delay in filing the Revenue&#039;s appeal was condoned because the explanation was found sufficient. On the stay issue, mono potassium phosphate was examined only prima facie for classification purposes: the chemical analysis report, treatment under the Fertiliser Control Order, the absence of departmental testing of the imported consignment, and the tariff scheme under Heading 3105 and Chapter Note 6 to Chapter 31 all weighed against stay. The Revenue therefore failed to establish a prima facie case, and the stay application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:18:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 778 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154933</link>
      <description>A marginal 3-day delay in filing the Revenue&#039;s appeal was condoned because the explanation was found sufficient. On the stay issue, mono potassium phosphate was examined only prima facie for classification purposes: the chemical analysis report, treatment under the Fertiliser Control Order, the absence of departmental testing of the imported consignment, and the tariff scheme under Heading 3105 and Chapter Note 6 to Chapter 31 all weighed against stay. The Revenue therefore failed to establish a prima facie case, and the stay application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>