<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 829 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154930</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the bonus received for ladle management should not be included in the value of bricks sold. The Tribunal found that the bonus received post-clearance does not impact the value of goods already cleared and duty paid. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:08:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 829 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154930</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the bonus received for ladle management should not be included in the value of bricks sold. The Tribunal found that the bonus received post-clearance does not impact the value of goods already cleared and duty paid. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>