https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154928 The appellant's delay in filing appeals was not condoned due to lack of acceptable reasons, but a justice-oriented approach allowed for delay condonation applications on terms. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit Rs. 7,86,401 within 4 weeks under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. Compliance was required to avoid dismissal of appeals. Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for interest and penalty were contingent on timely compliance with the duty amount pre-deposit requirement. The judgment emphasized timely compliance and procedural adherence alongside principles of substantial justice and fairness. en-us Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:49:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154928 The appellant's delay in filing appeals was not condoned due to lack of acceptable reasons, but a justice-oriented approach allowed for delay condonation applications on terms. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit Rs. 7,86,401 within 4 weeks under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. Compliance was required to avoid dismissal of appeals. Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for interest and penalty were contingent on timely compliance with the duty amount pre-deposit requirement. The judgment emphasized timely compliance and procedural adherence alongside principles of substantial justice and fairness. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154928