<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 777 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154924</link>
    <description>Penalty imposed for availing exemption under Notification No. 108/95 was found unsustainable where the goods had been cleared for a project funded by the Japan Bank for International Co-operation and the duty with interest was later paid. On those facts, the penalty confirmed by the lower appellate authority was deleted, and no penal liability survived. The duty and interest liability remained undisturbed, so relief was confined only to removal of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:15:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 777 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154924</link>
      <description>Penalty imposed for availing exemption under Notification No. 108/95 was found unsustainable where the goods had been cleared for a project funded by the Japan Bank for International Co-operation and the duty with interest was later paid. On those facts, the penalty confirmed by the lower appellate authority was deleted, and no penal liability survived. The duty and interest liability remained undisturbed, so relief was confined only to removal of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>