https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154919 SC held the preliminary decree voidable because the plaintiff procured it by deliberate fraud on the court, having withheld and failed to mention a vital release deed executed in favor of the defendants' vendor. The court found non-production of the document tantamount to playing fraud on the court and on the opposing party, and rejected the HC's view that defendants alone bore responsibility for producing a certified copy. A litigant approaching the court must produce all relevant executed documents; withholding them to gain advantage vitiates the decree. en-us Wed, 27 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Oct 2025 13:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154919 SC held the preliminary decree voidable because the plaintiff procured it by deliberate fraud on the court, having withheld and failed to mention a vital release deed executed in favor of the defendants' vendor. The court found non-production of the document tantamount to playing fraud on the court and on the opposing party, and rejected the HC's view that defendants alone bore responsibility for producing a certified copy. A litigant approaching the court must produce all relevant executed documents; withholding them to gain advantage vitiates the decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154919